Harry Browne: Is War Really Necessary?

Search

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,398
Tokens
I have managed to live on this planet for 70 years without ever striking another human being.

There have been a dozen or so times when someone wanted to fight me. I managed to talk my way out of a fight in most of those cases. In the few times I didn't succeed in avoiding a fight altogether, I managed to end the scuffle without hitting the other person and without suffering any noticeable damage to myself.

Granted, I've been fortunate. I grew up in a peaceful suburban area. Had I had the bad fortune to have been born in the inner city in a gang neighborhood, I might not have avoided violence so easily.

But that's an important point. Being fortunate in the circumstances of my birth and my growing-up, I didn't squander that good fortune by looking for trouble.

The U.S. by Birth

America was also fortunate in the circumstances of its birth.

After one apparently necessary fight to extricate itself from British rule, it found itself in the best neighborhood possible. It is bounded by two friendly countries and two enormous oceans. No need here to look for trouble.

And yet, ruled by American instead of British politicians, the United States has found itself embroiled in one street fight after another.

In fact, in the 20th century there were less than 20 years in which America was at peace with the world. What with World Wars, the Cold War, police actions, gunboat diplomacy in Latin America, overthrowing governments in Iran and other places, suppressing the Philippine rebellion, interfering with the Mexican revolution, firing missiles at Afghanistan and the Sudan, invading Panama and Grenada, bombing Libya, and on and on and on, Americans have lived with the tension of conflict and violence almost their entire lives.

And we live in a good neighborhood!

The Swiss by Birth

Contrast our circumstances with those of Switzerland.

The poor Swiss have the misfortune of living in the middle of one of the worst neighborhoods in the world. Centuries of imperial rivalries, ethnic hatreds, governments armed to the teeth and ready to go to war at the drop of the hat, and populations nursing grudges against each other — all these elements have kept Europe in turmoil for centuries.

Switzerland is like the inner-city family that hears gunfire outside its windows every night.

And yet Switzerland hasn't been involved in a single war for two centuries. The Swiss managed to avoid being sucked into the World Wars, the Cold War, or any of the other conflicts that have beset Europe.

The Swiss haven't been fortunate in their geographical circumstances. But they've dealt with those circumstances intelligently. It wasn't by the grace of dictators that they've avoided war; it has been a national policy to do so.

The Swiss have always made sure it was in the self-interest of warring nations to leave Switzerland out of their quarrels. They've devised ingenious defenses to demonstrate that, while Switzerland is not unconquerable, the cost of conquest would be intolerable to the conqueror. And they've made themselves an indispensable trading partner to any country that otherwise might see some profit in invading Switzerland.

It may seem that war is inevitable for many countries — such as the warring factions in the Balkans or some countries in Asia or Africa. But Switzerland has proven that it isn't inevitable for anyone — not even for a country as poorly situated as Switzerland is.

Why then is America continually at war over one thing or another?

The "Last Resort"

Whenever the U.S. goes to war somewhere, the politicians tell us that diplomacy was tried and failed — and that war was the very, very, very last resort.

But the truth is that the politicians didn't try much at all to avoid war. And the diplomacy was bound to fail, because it involved our politicians making insensitive demands on a foreign country — demands we had no authority to make and were known in advance to be unacceptable to the foreigners.

In the few cases that America has been attacked, it's been because our politicians were trying to dictate to other countries — countries that represented no threat to us at all. The foreigners attacked either to try to gain an advantage against the stronger U.S. when our government had made war seem inevitable (as at Pearl Harbor), or because attacking seemed the only way to strike back at a country that was throwing its weight around in other people's business (as in 9/11).

Our Neighborhood

How easy it would have been for Americans to have lived the past two centuries in peace. We have never been attacked by a country that hadn't first been subject to interference by our politicians.

Maybe others aren't so fortunately situated, but we are.

No one can seriously believe that terrorists have struck America because they hate our freedom, our democracy, or our prosperity. If that were true, they would have warmed up first by attacking Switzerland — an easier target.

And if someone asks how you would handle the terrorists without war, now that Pandora's Box has been opened, here's a simple answer:

I'm not certain what I'd do, but I know one thing for sure: With $2 trillion a year at my disposal, I could hire the best minds in the world to find a solution that didn't involve using the cave-man tactics of trying to beat people to death.

But no one in power is interested in finding alternatives to war. They arm to the teeth and then tell us we will obtain "peace through strength."

Well, America has been overwhelmingly strong for a century, and we're still waiting to see the peace. As Charles Beard put it, we've had "perpetual war for perpetual peace." Perhaps part of the problem is that we have an overwhelming national offense, but practically no national defense.

Is It Necessary?

I have never hit anyone, and not doing so has caused me no humiliation; nor has it made me a target for bullies. If America made peace the object, it need be neither humiliated nor picked upon.

Is war necessary?

For Americans, no.

Is war inevitable?

For Americans, yes — so long as we give politicians the power to meddle in our lives and in the lives of foreigners.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,228
Tokens
Switzerland has a special place in European thinking/the euro psyche.

It has been avoided by every warm-o-n-g-e-ring gangster for years and years, including Hitler, because if any of them ever DO fall on hard times a secret Swiss account filled with money is the most secure fallback you can have if your masterplan for euro/world domination goes pearshaped.

You can hide anywhere in the world, and transfer cash to your hidey-hole as and when you need it.
No questions asked, and the money gets shifted.

Belgium and Luxembourg were neutral and wouldn't hurt a fly, it didn't do them any good.
Belgium is famous for Chocolate, Smurfs and dufflecoats, not secret bank accounts, so it got gobbled up, as did Luxembourg.

Its also handy having a neutral banking country on your doorstep that you can launder huge wedges of illegal money and illegally gotten assets through.

This is the 'special place' that Switzerland has in the euro-psyche.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,398
Tokens
Swiss banking secrecy went the way of the dodo long ago; what they have now is nowhere near what they did historically.

I'm of a mind that not getting invaded by the Nazis had rather a lot more to do with their memory of their other catastrophic loss when fighting in an hostile environment (Russia) and the fact that there is an armed male in every other home in Switzerland.

If America would overhaul its abomination of a military to reserve system, with the Navy an Special Forces left intact, we'd be substantially more powerful defensively at about 1/5th the current cost.


Phaedrus
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
2,228
Tokens
The fact that every householder carried a shotgun or airpistol or whatever, wouldn't have deterred Hitler even slightly.

Squishing entire countries in the Blitzkreig meatgrinder was a doddle until they reached that furthest point eastwards.
A place known as Stalingrad, where every householder had a T-34 and a million dead soldiers was just a really crap week,-but we'll try again next week guys.

Only the nut cases in Yugoslavia/The Balkans kept up any real resistance in Europe throughout WW2.(And they're still killing each other now, like in Bosnia.-Yugoslavia is actually a kind of european Afghanistan.)

If you ever visit Yugoslavia it becomes obvious how they were able to survive/keep going with some supplies from the allies. The country is really rugged, and the people there are as tough and macho as hell.
The Invasion of the USSR was delayed by six weeks because the Germans had so much trouble in the Balkans.

Its also the most beautiful place that I have ever visited in europe.
Until the Bosnian disaster, it was a great destination for tourists.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
5,398
Tokens
posted by eek:
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>
The fact that every householder carried a shotgun or airpistol or whatever, wouldn't have deterred Hitler even slightly.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Nearly every able-bodied male citizen between the ages of (I believe) 20 and 55 is in the military. They had access to quite a bit more than pea shooters and slingshots.

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>
Squishing entire countries in the Blitzkreig meatgrinder was a doddle until they reached that furthest point eastwards.
A place known as Stalingrad, where every householder had a T-34 and a million dead soldiers was just a really crap week,-but we'll try again next week guys.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Right. Germany had no problem rolling over France, Poland et al.; in Russia they faced skilled, motivated and dedicated opposition in an hostile environment. They would have faced the same in Switzerland.

Interestingly, years later the lesson was forgotten and the U.S.S.R. did the same stupid shit to themselves in Afghanistan, except that they had the resources and stupidity to keep it up for a decade.

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>
Only the nut cases in Yugoslavia/The Balkans kept up any real resistance in Europe throughout WW2.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Lovely people. Tito, the only anti-Soviet communist in the modern world.
suomi.gif


<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>
(And they're still killing each other now, like in Bosnia.-Yugoslavia is actually a kind of european Afghanistan.)
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

It's died down a bit. Yugoslavia no longer exists; it's become ... well ... Balkanised. Just like the U.S. will be in a few decades.

<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>
If you ever visit Yugoslavia it becomes obvious how they were able to survive/keep going with some supplies from the allies. The country is really rugged, and the people there are as tough and macho as hell.

...

Its also the most beautiful place that I have ever visited in europe. Until the Bosnian disaster, it was a great destination for tourists.
<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

Still is; Zagreb and most of the rest of Croatia is great; I spent a few weeks there last year and hope to return this year. Montenegro is not bad either. Never been to any of the other parts.


Phaedrus
 

Doin' the life thing...
Joined
Aug 20, 2001
Messages
3,878
Tokens
Historically speaking, the U.S. has entered a process that will ultimately become its own doom. Throughout history, we can see how empires have failed to realize that every expansion process must be followed by a time of peace. Why? Because the very bases of any empire -its people- grow weary of always being fighting.
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>In fact, in the 20th century there were less than 20 years in which America was at peace with the world. What with World Wars, the Cold War, police actions, gunboat diplomacy in Latin America, overthrowing governments in Iran and other places, suppressing the Philippine rebellion, interfering with the Mexican revolution, firing missiles at Afghanistan and the Sudan, invading Panama and Grenada, bombing Libya, and on and on and on, Americans have lived with the tension of conflict and violence almost their entire lives. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
Once an empire has engaged in a frenzy of conquest ruled by merciless whims, it's coming to an end. Organically speaking, every empire has imploted.

In the past, the US was a very strong country bacause of the millions of people that worked hard to forge a nation. People from every place in this world put their faith in a brighter future for their kids. People believed in achieving a better existence through hard work - (for somebody with my beliefs, it's abvious they were used by the governing elite, but it worked anyway)

That bright future these people worked for is today.

Nowadays, the U.S. is being devoured in its very inside by intestine wars. If somebody refuses to see it that way, tell me why the Hip Hop underground culture speaks of killing, drug abuse, alcoholism and plain hedonism as if it were an everyday thing. Wait... it IS an everyday thing.

The baby boomers, the generation that virtually formed the US as we know it, are on their way out and the younger American generations have never really lived under circumstances of adversity, so I doubt seriously that they will have the COLLECTIVE character to maintain a cohesive nation.

America is not attending the most urgent of all calls: its people calling for security and safety. This government has made everybody believe that this lack of security is originated outside the country's borders, but they're failing to aknowledge the intern problems of such a big and diverse nation. Tolerance is a thing of the past or simply a virtue of the educated. A reign divided cannot stand.

Historically speaking, the US must react right now to avoid an implosion (a process that might take decades), but if History repeats itself, the cycle is over and the shifting of powers is imminent.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,179
Messages
13,565,017
Members
100,755
Latest member
fb68winn
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com